|
| |
Older Light Floor Structure |
|
| |
 |
Impact
Sound |
 |
Airborne
Sound |
|
|
|
|
Example 1: Levels of Impact Sound and Muffling of Airborne Sound |
|
| |
We tested typical older loft ceiling beams
(loft ceiling beams with subfloor, tongued and grooved timber with sawed
face and sawdust) where the impact sound level, as usual, was very high
coupled with the well known low frequency problems.
Since the demands on a solution are great we chose to use the SoundSeal
structure with double layers of DECIBEL3 and, in this specific project,
a 50 mm's trowelling. |
|
| |
Result: |
| |
|
The result shows a
fundamental condition with an impact sound level of L'n,w+C 50-3150 =
67 dB (L'n,w
= 64 dB).
After the measures with the SoundSeal structure with double DECIBEL3 were taken, L'n,w+C 50-3150 = 56 dB (L'n,w =
50 dB), was obtained, i.e.
an improvement of approx. 11 dB (L'n,w =
14 dB).
The fundamental condition for the muffling of the airborne sound R'w+C 50-3150 was approx.
46 dB and it was improved to
60 dB, i.e. an improvement of approx.
14 dB. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Modern Light Structure |
|
| |
By building new modern structures of a light design these may be constructed
in a way that the acoustic fundamental readings become much better than what we are used to
in old structures. As always, one has to find a solution that is effective technically
speaking and also financially reasonable.
This is often difficult to obtain.
We have taken part in a SBUF project that Skanska Teknik
in Malmoe has been responsible for. The project was based on finding the most effective
solution on airborne sound muffling and level of impact sound combined with a competitive
product and installation price.
Our contribution consisted of the SoundSeal structure comprising the DECIBEL3 mat with
30 mm's gypsum screeding from TM Progress. Please, consult us for further information
about the project. The results are presented below. |
|
| |
 |
Impact Sound |
 |
Airborne
Sound |
|
|
|
Example with
DECIBEL3 + 30 mm's Gypsum Screeding |
|
| |
The structure was organised as follows: |
|
Product |
mm's |
|
TM Gypsum Screeding |
30 |
|
DECIBEL3 |
10 |
|
Particle Board V313 |
22 |
|
Kerto laminated timber beam 45x300x600 |
300 |
|
Mineral Wool Insulation |
300 |
|
Acoustic Profile s400 |
25 |
|
Gypsum |
13 |
|
Gypsum |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Result: |
| |
|
First of all it should be
mentioned that the support base per se is good acoustically speaking. The results are
laboratory readings.
The starting point for the structure was an impact sound level of Lw +CI 50-2500
= 58 dB and Rw + C50-3150 =
57 dB The total result for the SoundSeal structure
was very successful. We arrived at an impact sound level Lw +CI 50-2500 =
47 dB and Rw
+ C50-3150 = 65 dB. The SoundSeal structure proved to be
very effective and competitive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The obtained results have theoretically shown that gypsum screeding has proved to be somewhat better (1-2 dB) in comparison with a cement based trowelling. Further evaluation, on site measuring and also future comparisons will be
accounted for on our web page. However, there are parameters for cementbased trowelling
as well as gypsum screeding in the data base of BASTIAN. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
Airborne Sound |
|
| |
Example: Muffling of Airborne Sound DECIBEL3 + 13 mm's Gypsum Floor Board |
|
| |
Even if it is better to use DECIBEL3 in the SoundSeal structure the
height of the floor could be a critical factor and one is therefore forced to compromise.
That is the reason to why we show an example of a project where the height of the finished
floor was a critical factor, which lead to our choosing a 13 mm's gypsum floor board on
top of one layer of DECIBEL3.
We had to find a compromise that involved an acceptable improvement of
the muffling
of the airborne sound in the frequency midrange.
In this specific case the structure involved approx. 120 mm's concrete with approx.
30 mm's trowelling, a form 150 mm's woodwool and under that 30 mm's plaster. The
structure showed the following improvement of the muffling of the airborne sound: |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Result: |
| |
|
The original muffling in the structure
showed a muffling of the airborne sound (R'w + C 50-3150 Hz) equivalent to
47 dB. The improvement with DECIBEL3 and 13 mm's gypsum added was
5 dB,
to 52 dB.
This means that we have moved from not passing sound insulation class D to passing class C in an
effective way according to former BBR requirements.
Even if the solution could be made more effective an acceptable compromise was achieved rather simply in this case. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: |
| |
|
The DECIBEL3 mat is a very effective key to solving
acoustic problems in light as well as beam and slab floors. DECIBEL3 may be combined with
different sheet materials, but generally it is recommended that the mat is used, in single
or double layers, as an integrated part in the SoundSeal structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For customized calculations on optional
constructions we refer to the calculation programme
BASTIAN,
where the parameters for different constructions are in the database. If you do not have access
to this programme, please contact us so we may help you performing the desired calculations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DECIBEL3 Combined with Sheet Material |
|
| |
DECIBEL3 may be combined with self-supporting sheet material like e.g. 22 mm's
particle boards, 18 mm's plywood, minerit, cementbased particle board or 2x13 mm's gypsum
floor boards. Because of the fact that the density on top of the DECIBEL mat is important
a sheet material with the highest possible density is primarily recommended. This will help
affect the lower frequencies too. |
|
| |
Laying double layers of a sheet material also helps overlapping joints
which results in a stronger structure. If there is a tongue-and-groove joint as an
option this is the strongest choice. The result with sheet material on top of the
DECIBEL mats could in simple way be compared mathematically with the facts we have
concerning SoundSeal. By comparing the density of the sheet material with the given
readings one can generally speaking draw parallel conclusions. |
 |
|
|
Up |